« 2007-05 | HomePage | 2007-07 »
30/06/2007
tv shows
My fav. tv shows from the oldies until now, in no specific order:
- Star Trek the Next Generation
- Golden Girls
- Dynasty
- Planet Earth Series
- Thorn Birds
- The Legend of the Condor Heroes
- The Return of the Condor Heroes
- Return to Eden
- specific animes [noir, hana yori dango, candy candy, kenshin, etc]
- So You Think You Can Dance
- Top Chef
- Iron Chef
- House
- Oprah Winfrey [more in the old days than now]
- Deutsche Welle's journal
- Deugtsche Welle's euromaxx
- Family Matters
- Sex and the City
- vh1 pop up video
- anything cultural related from around the world.
07:53 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals
29/06/2007
about wednesday
The white house debacle is tiring to watch. One can't wait for Bush's term as a president to be over. not a moment too soon.
On Wednesday, it was mr. analyst's birthday. It was also, married-guy's last night in the city. He was flying out that same night. We, me and married-guy had plan for the evening.
I knew it was mr. analyst's birthday, I remember well about family and friends' birthdays in general, sent a birthday wish early in the day. Mr. analyst on the other hand didn't mention anything at all about celebration on wednesday, not a week before, not three days before, not the day before, and knowing him, I figured that the celebration would probably this weekend, not on working days.
Even on wednesday morning when we smsed each other back and forth he didn't mention anything. Then suddenly an sms from him came in around four-ish p.m. saying that hey, let's celebrate. And well, I was the only person he wanted to celebrate with. I asked repeatedly whether he was sure about wanting to celebrate that evening, considering he had gym appt. to go to. He said he was sure.
And stupid me, I felt pity for him, because it was his birthday, and in my book no one should feel bad on their birthdays. So, with a heavy heart, I cancelled my evening with married-guy. [stupid. stupid. stupid.] He was disappointed. I was more than disappointed, but hey, I was thinking it was for a good cause.
Even while during my sms to mr. analyst, I already started asking a few times where and what time he wanted to meet. He didn't answer that particular question, though I knew he to be indecisive. Then I had a meeting around five p.m. for an hour.
After the meeting, I smsed him again, asking where he wanted to meet, I thought I'd stay at work until the time. One short sms around six-thirty saying that he still had gym to do. Finally, with no news until eight thirty p.m. I smsed him that I am going home. Then I called married-guy to check where he was and hailed a cab. By the time I got to where he was, we only had about thirty minutes before he had to head to the airport.
Mr. Analyst tried to call around eight thirty, trying to get me to meet him wherever, and every half an hour afterwards which I ignored.
I was royally pissed at him.
This is why I didn't want to be his girlfriend. He still had a lot to learn.
08:55 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals
28/06/2007
wednesday
yesterday day is one of the worst day of days.
what's more it could actually be one of those perfect days.
bleh.
07:01 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals
27/06/2007
to run for a president, it should be required they have a real job first
I sincerely hope that Bloomberg would run for President in 2008 and if he does, I hope that he'd pick Arnold as his running mate.
Both men are men of actions more than of words. They get things done that are needed to be done.
As I saw Arnold shaking hand with Blair, it is hard to not notice his charisma. There was a man who could stand his own in the world, pleasant, charming, no-nonsense, and believes in saving the world for future generation but also realistic enough that to achieve impossible dreams you have to start with small steps. But you _have to_ start those small steps. not pretending problems don't exist.
Bloomberg would be a terrific President for the country across the board and Arnold would be a great VP in correcting the relationship between the US with the rest of the world.
This has convinced me that indeed it should be a requirement for anyone who wants to run for the President to have real jobs first and successful in his/her job regardless whatever field it is, except lawyers. Anyone who studied the law, if they want to run for govt. office, should only be allowed to run for the judicial office, and no where else. Practicing of law cannot be mixed with governing. So lawyer should either go private or just be DA/judges/justice.
Those who have aimed to run as a politician all their lives, in return, have their whole lifetime to learn about politic as itself and how to manipulate it so they could end up as a politician. Whereas people who have "real" jobs won't have time to learn how to manipulate the arena of governing and its structures. And because they have real jobs, they also live in the real worlds and realize what is more important and what's not in the daily life, in touch, grounded. And because they are successful in their fields, they know how it takes to get things done, and successful people are rarely hermits, that means they interract with other people, and usually not only in their fields, this gives them more point of views than most politicians who just hang out with other politicians.
In my theory, then you wouldn't end up with someone like the ratty looking leader the US govt. has at the moment.
I am keeping my fingers cross.
07:50 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals, politics
26/06/2007
non heavy entry
I was asked by a friend what turned me off men:
- someone who isn't alpha, meaning mediocre.
- someone who is more vain than me, and since I am not very vain in general,
it really is a turn off for a man to be one. metrosexual <> vain.
- Someone who isn't funny.
- Someone who isn't smart.
- Someone who thinks he is a bad boy.
- Someone who inks his whole body.
- Someone who reads women magazines. Get a life. Leave our magazines
to us.
- Someone who doesn't care about his body odour. Let's face it
masculine smell can only go so far before it gets yucky. Again
metrosexual <> vain.
- Someone who isn't accomplished in any way.
- Someone who dresses sloppily.
-end of that for now-
17:07 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals
25/06/2007
an article
a friend sent this article to me, because she knew how much this break up with Omega affected me and she thought the article would help.
I thought to share it here :
PARTNERS AND MARRIAGE
By Eduardo Jose E. Calasanz
I have never met a man who didn't want to be loved. But I have seldom
met a man who didn't fear marriage. Something about the closure seems
constricting, not enabling. Marriage seems easier to understand for what
it cuts out of our lives than for what it makes possible within our
lives.
When I was younger this fear immobilized me. I did not want to make a
mistake. I saw my friends get married for reasons of social
acceptability, or sexual fever, or just because they thought it was the
logical thing to do. Then I watched, as they and their partners became
embittered and petty in their dealings with each other. I looked at
older couples and saw, at best, mutual toleration of each other. I
imagined a lifetime of loveless nights and bickering and could not
imagine subjecting myself or someone else to such a fate.
And yet, on rare occasions, I would see old couples who somehow seemed
to glow in each other's presence. They seemed really in love, not just
dependent upon each other and tolerant of each other's foibles. It was
an astounding sight, and it seemed possible. How, I asked myself, can
they have survived so many years of sameness, so much irritation at the
other's habits? What keeps love alive in them, when most of us seem
unable to even stay together, much less love each other?
The central secret seems to be in choosing well. There is something to
the claim of fundamental compatibility. Good people can create a bad
relationship, even though they both dearly want the relationship to
succeed. It is important to find someone with whom you can create a good
relationship from the outset. Unfortunately, it is hard to see clearly
in the early stages. Sexual hunger draws you to each other and colors
the way you see yourselves together. It blinds you to the thousands of
little things by which relationships eventually survive or fail. You
need to find a way to see beyond this initial overwhelming sexual
fascination. Some people choose to involve themselves sexually and ride
out the most heated period of sexual attraction in order to see what is
on the other side.
This can work, but it can also leave a trail of wounded hearts. Others
deny the sexual side altogether in an attempt to get to know each other
apart from their sexuality. But they cannot see clearly, because the
presence of unfulfilled sexual desire looms so large that it keeps them
from having any normal perception of what life would be like together.
The truly lucky people are the ones who manage to become long-time
friends before they realize they are attracted to each other. They get
to know each other's laughs, passions, sadness, and fears. They see each
other at their worst and at their best. They share time together before
they get swept into the entangling intimacy of their sexuality.
This is the ideal, but not often possible. If you fall under the spell
of your sexual attraction immediately, you need to look beyond it for
other keys to compatibility. One of these is laughter. Laughter tells
you how much you will enjoy each other's company over the long term.
If your laughter together is good and healthy, and not at the expense of
others, then you have a healthy relationship to the world. Laughter is
the child of surprise. If you can make each other laugh, you can always
surprise each other. And if you can always surprise each other, you can
always keep the world around you new.
Beware of a relationship in which there is no laughter. Even the most
intimate relationships based only on seriousness have a tendency to turn
sour. Over time, sharing a common serious viewpoint on the world tends
to turn you against those who do not share the same viewpoint, and your
relationship can become based on being critical together.
After laughter, look for a partner who deals with the world in a way you
respect. When two people first get together, they tend to see their
relationship as existing only in the space between the two of them. They
find each other endlessly fascinating, and the overwhelming power of the
emotions they are sharing obscures the outside world. As the
relationship ages and grows, the outside world becomes important again.
If your partner treats people or circumstances in a way you can't
accept, you will inevitably come to grief. Look at the way she cares for
others and deals with the daily affairs of life. If that makes you love
her more, your love will grow. If it does not, be careful. If you do not
respect the way you each deal with the world around you, eventually the
two of you will not respect each other.
Look also at how your partner confronts the mysteries of life. We live
on the cusp of poetry and practicality, and the real life of the heart
resides in the poetic. If one of you is deeply affected by the mystery
of the unseen in life and relationships, while the other is drawn only
to the literal and the practical, you must take care that the distance
doesn't become an unbridgeable gap that leaves you each feeling isolated
and misunderstood.
There are many other keys, but you must find them by yourself. We all
have unchangeable parts of our hearts that we will not betray and
private commitments to a vision of life that we will not deny. If you
fall in love with someone who cannot nourish those inviolable parts of
you, or if you cannot nourish them in her, you will find yourselves
growing further apart until you live in separate worlds where you share
the business of life, but never touch each other where the heart lives
and dreams. From there it is only a small leap to the cataloging of
petty hurts and daily failures that leaves so many couples bitter and
unsatisfied with their mates.
So choose carefully and well. If you do, you will have chosen a partner
with whom you can grow, and then the real miracle of marriage can take
place in your hearts. I pick my words carefully when I speak of a
miracle. But I think it is not too strong a word. There is a miracle in
marriage. It is called transformation. Transformation is one of the most
common events of nature. The seed becomes the flower. The cocoon becomes
the butterfly. Winter becomes spring and love becomes a child. We never
question these, because we see them around us every day. To us they are
not miracles, though if we did not know them they would be impossible to
believe. Marriage is a transformation we choose to make. Our love is
planted like a seed, and in time it begins to flower. We cannot know the
flower that will blossom, but we can be sure that a bloom will come.
If you have chosen carefully and wisely, the bloom will be good. If you
have chosen poorly or for the wrong reason, the bloom will be flawed. We
are quite willing to accept the reality of negative transformation in a
marriage. It was negative transformation that always had me terrified of
the bitter marriages that I feared when I was younger. It never occurred
tome to question the dark miracle that transformed love into harshness
and bitterness. Yet I was unable to accept the possibility that the
first heat of love could be transformed into something positive that was
actually deeper and more meaningful than the heat of fresh passion. All
I could believe in was the power of this passion and the fear that when
it cooled I would be left with something lesser and bitter.
But there is positive transformation as well. Like negative
transformation, it results from a slow accretion of little things. But
instead of death by a thousand blows, it is growth by a thousand touches
of love. Two histories intermingle. Two separate beings, two separate
presence, two separate consciousnesses come together and share a view of
life that passes before them. They remain separate, but they also become
one. There is an expansion of awareness, not a closure and a
constriction, as I had once feared. This is not to say that there is not
tension and there are not traps. Tension and traps are part of every
choice of life, from celibate to monogamous to having multiple lovers.
Each choice contains within it the lingering doubt that the road not
taken somehow more fruitful and exciting, and each becomes dulled to the
richness that it alone contains.
But only marriage allows life to deepen and expand and be leavened by
the knowledge that two have chosen, against all odds, to become one.
Those who live together without marriage can know the pleasure of shared
company, but there is a specific gravity in the marriage commitment that
deepens that experience into something richer and more complex.
So do not fear marriage, just as you should not rush into it for the
wrong reasons. It is an act of faith and it contains within it the power
of transformation. If you believe in your heart that you have found
someone with whom you are able to grow, if you have sufficient faith
that you can resist the endless attraction of the road not taken and the
partner not chosen, if you have the strength of heart to embrace the
cycles and seasons that your love will experience, then you may be ready
to seek the miracle that marriage offers. If not, then wait. The easy
grace of a marriage well made is worth your patience. When the time
comes, a thousand flowers will bloom...endlessly.
18:21 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals
short short
Spent the weekend with married-guy at the Four Seasons. Went to see things, including the pride parade.
For the first time since a long time I really really had fun. He buttered me up, entertained me, made me laugh and forget my blues.
I am not interested to write more than that for now.
Other than the fact I am quite proud of myself and didn't agree to break up a marriage.
Though it's still to be continued.
18:12 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals
24/06/2007
he always does the most unexpected thing
At worked I was being paged, saying that someone, a client, was waiting for me at the lobby. My next appointment was supposed to be two hours away, yet, a sudden appearance of a client without a prior engagement is not uncommon in my line of work.
Half-curious, half-wary, since usually sudden appearance means not a good news or something needed to be changed or other many wrong reasons, I went down from my office to the lobby.
As I walked through the lobby, I saw someone who made me stood rooted at where I was, surprised then thinking it must've been a coincidence then to a gnawing suspicion.
There he was. married-guy.
at the lobby at where I work. acting as he had always been acting. Nonchalant. supremely relax and confident.
In my fantasy,
the person I expected/wanted to make a sudden appearance like that is certainly someone else. Certainly someone who wasn't married. Someone who was not specifically forbidden to come to new york by me.
Yet, there he was. Of all the men in my life. There he was.
The only men in my life who is married. still married. still has a wife. still has a daughter.
The one I least thought who understood how to please me.
There he was.
And suddenly my tears welled up.
At the same time he spotted me. he saw the tears.
He knew me. he stirred me right quick out of the hotel and walked a block away. And he held me in his arms. while I cried.
in public.
there he was. holding me while I broke apart.
the last man on earth I expected/wanted to be there.
yet.
there he was.
07:51 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals
21/06/2007
movie stars magnet
I caught Letterman show last night with Matt Damon in it. His interview [Matt Damon's] only confirms more and more that he is one seriously humorous guy, sharp and witty, with a pleasant demeanor, easy to see why he is quite a good actor. Unlike his friend, Ben Affleck. My, each time I saw a movie where he starred, I ended up wanting to throw something onto the screen because his acting is so bad.
In the end, I just avoid Ben Affleck's movies like a plague. Before him, it was Brad Pitt, who's still a bad actor but surprisingly much better than Affleck.
So, this is the list of movie stars [men and women] whose acting compelled me to see or to avoid a movie [aside, of course, my penchant to see a movie by the title alone or anything that has to do with dancing]:
To see:
- Denzel Washington
- Tom Hanks
- Cate Blanchett
- Gong Li
- Jodie Foster
- Harrison Ford
- Al Pacino
To avoid:
- Ben Affleck
- Cameron Diaz
the rest fall in between you can see their movies or not and it is okay, too.
17:24 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals
summer
well, well, summer is finally here.
05:20 Posted in Blog | Permalink | Comments (0) | Email this | Tags: journals

